MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4393549963 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3942730

Data and scripts for: Intercomparison of atmospheric datasets and PBL schemes for precipitation downscaling over a coastal mountain valley of northern British Columbia, Canada

2020· dataset· en· W4393549963 on OpenAlexaffabout
Chibuike Onwukwe, Peter L. Jackson, Stephen J. Déry

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDownscalingPrecipitationCoupled model intercomparison projectClimatologyScripting languageEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyClimate changeGeographyClimate modelOceanographyGeologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

anl_6MYJdiv and anl_6MYNNdiv contains pairwise normalizations of dataset outputs (NAM/ERA5, NAM/NARR and ERA5/NARR) of total rainfall in 2017 for simulations with the MYJ and MYNN3 PBL schemes, that can be plotted by fig3_4.ncl. anl_MYJMYNN_div contains MYJ/MYNN3 spatial contours for each of ERA5, NAM -ANL and NARR outputs. anl_snow_MYJ contains MYJ output for total snow in 2017 by the ERA5, NAM-ANL and NARR datasets, for which values at discrete locations can be retrieved with yr2017snow.ncl, daily_ppt.ncl is script to extract modeled daily precipitation (dly_MYJ and dly_MYNN) from the various locations. Fig_ppt_monthly.R is the plotting script for observed and modeled precipitation time series from hydro31pt1pk.txt. nullwrf is array holder for plotting with ncl scripts. rivs_coasts.shp is shape file that is used in the spatial plots.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0710.049

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→