MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4393551418 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4700425

Hydraulic mixing cell simulation of sources of surface water in the Weierbach catchment

2021· dataset· en· W4393551418 on OpenAlexaff
Barbara Glaser, Luisa Hopp, Daniel Partington, Philip Brunner, René Therrien, Julian Klaus

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMixing (physics)Hydrology (agriculture)Environmental scienceSurface (topology)Drainage basinSurface waterGeologyGeotechnical engineeringEnvironmental engineeringGeographyMathematicsPhysicsCartographyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dataset contains the meteorological forcing data and results of the hydraulic mixing cell (HMC) simulation presented and discussed in the research article: Sources of surface water in space and time: Identification of delivery processes and geographical sources with hydraulic mixing-cell modeling (DOI:10.1029/2021WR030332) The simulation was performed with the model HydroGeoSphere and the HMC modelling was used to identify the delivery processes and geographical sources of surface water at specific points of interest (POI) within the riparian-stream continuum of the Weierbach catchment (Luxembourg). Detailed information on the model setup, the location of the POIs, the considered source types and source areas, and the processing we applied to the raw simulation output is given in the research article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies→French-language works237,207→