MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393553427 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5116419

3-D synthetic near surface data set with frequency-domain electromagnetic induction data

2021· dataset· en· W4393553427 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
João Narciso, Leonardo Azevedo, Ellen Van De Vijver

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData setDomain (mathematical analysis)Frequency domainSet (abstract data type)Surface (topology)Synthetic dataComputer scienceAlgorithmMathematicsArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysisGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Realistic three-dimensional exhaustive data set that mimics a near surface mining landfill deposit of waste fine-shaly sands. The data set is composed by petrophysical properties and frequency domain electromagnetic induction (FDEM) data and was created with the purpose of testing algorithms for near-surface modeling and characterization using electromagnetic data. The set of petrophysical properties include porosity, water saturation, particle density and density. Each property corresponds to a single geostatistical realization. The three-dimensional model has a dimension of 150 by 200 by 4 meters (i.e., length, width, depth) with a cell size of 0.5 m by 0.5 m by 0.1 m, respectively (grid size of 300 x 400 x 40). The model grid has 4.8 million cells. Porosity and particle density were modelled based on samples of fine-shaly sands collected at a mine tailing in Portugal for which we investigated porosity, specific weight and particle density. The results of these investigations were used to generate three-dimensional models of subsurface rock properties with unconditional stochastic sequential simulation (Deutsch & Journel, 1998). Porosity was modelled with an omnidirectional spherical variogram model in the horizontal direction. The variogram model has a horizontal range of 10 m, a vertical range of 1 m and a nugget effect of 0.2 % of the total variance of the data. This variogram model describes the expected spatial distribution of this property in the mine tailing. To ensure plausibility between rock properties, particle density and water saturation models were generated with stochastic sequential co-simulation (Deutsch & Journel, 1998) conditioned to the porosity model. For particle density we imposed an omnidirectional spherical variogram model in the horizontal direction with a range of 10 m, a vertical range of 1 m and a nugget effect of 0.2 % of the total variance of the data, and the correlation between porosity and particle density from the lab measurements. For water saturation we imposed an omnidirectional spherical variogram model in the horizontal direction with a range of 16 m, a vertical range of 2 m and a nugget effect of 0.1 (%). For the co-simulation we imposed a correlation between porosity and water content, borrowed from Bhanbhro et al. (2013) and Dumont et al. (2016). The pore fluid was defined as consisting in 80% of water and 20% of leachate, having a density of 0.99114 g/cm3 at a temperature of 30ºC (Souza et al., 2014). The density was mathematically calculated from porosity and particle density models and the density of the pore fluid by using a simple volumetric average of the geological material densities and its relationship to porosity (Mavko et al., 2009), db = (1 - Ø) d0 Ø dfl , where d0 is the density of the mineral grains, dfl is the density of the pore fluids, and Ø is porosity. The electrical conductivity (EC) was created based on the well-known empirical relationship of Archie’s law (Archie, 1942). We first calculate electrical conductivity using the following equation, Rt = a Sw-n Ø-m Rw , where a is the tortuosity constant, assumed as 0.88, Sw is the water saturation, n is the saturation exponent, assumed as 2, Ø is the porosity, m is the cementation exponent, assumed as 1.37, and Rw is the electrical resistivity of the pore fluid, assumed as 0.25. From the lithology and range of porosity values of the mining landfill model, the values of a, n and m were defined from Keller (1987). The electrical resistivity of the pore fluid was defined based on its composition and density (Keller, 1987). The EC was calculated based on Archie´s second law (Archie, 1942), where conductivity of the partially saturated rock (ct) is the inverse of its resistivity (Rt), ct = 1 / Rt (Mavko et al., 2009). Since the relationship between magnetic minerals and the magnetic properties of the rocks depends primarily of the composition and grain size of them (Butler, 2005), the magnetic susceptibility (MS) was modelled using the common range of magnetic susceptibility for unconsolidated sediments (Hudson et al., 1999) with unconditional stochastic sequential simulation (Deutsch & Journel, 1998), imposing an omnidirectional spherical variogram model in the horizontal direction with a range of 20 m, a vertical range of 4 m and a nugget effect of 0.1 % of the total variance. From the resulting three-dimensional models of EC and MS, we retrieved nine equally spaced boreholes along the same yz profile. These borehole data might be used as experimental data for modelling workflows, including geophysical inversion. FDEM data, both the in-phase (IP) and quadrature-phase (QP), were calculated using a 1-D forward model (Hanssens et al., 2019). The acquisition configuration replicates one of the most common sensors for FDEM near-surface surveys, namely the DUALEM-421S (DUALEM Inc., Milton, Canada). It considers two loop-loop coil orientations, a horizontal coplanar (HCP) and a perpendicular one (PRP), with the normal 3 offsets per coil orientation for this equipment, 1, 2 and 4 meters for HCP, and 1.1, 2.1 and 4.1 meters for PRP, plus an extra offset per coil orientation, 10 meters for HCP and 10.1 meters for PRP, ensuring a theoretical larger depth of investigation. The FDEM data were calculated defining the operating frequency of the sensor as 9000 Hz, with an elevation to the surface of 0.15 m.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207