MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393556446 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.1303407

Assisting The Appraisal Of E-Mail Records With Automatic Classification

2018· dataset· en· W4393556446 on OpenAlexaff
André Vellino, Inge Alberts

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicData Quality and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceData miningInformation retrieval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This spreadsheet shows the results of training a series of Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifiers to replicate the decision process for identifying e-mails of business value from among 846 e-mails in two corporate mailboxes. One set of SVMs were trained on emails without including the text of attachments and with the inclusion of attachments. For the sake of comparison, these SVMs were also trained on Spam / Ham and on a randomly selected subset of Enron emails half of which were arbitrarily tagged as "business value".

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.189
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicData Quality and ManagementFrench-language works237,207