MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393559682 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7196689

Numerical Model Generated Hawaii Test Scenes for EarthCARE Pre-launch Studies - Part 1: Atmospheric and Surface Properties

2022· dataset· en· W4393559682 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhipeng Qu, David P. Donovan, Howard W. Barker, Jason N. S. Cole, Mark W. Shephard, Vincent Huijnen

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Design and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurface (topology)Environmental scienceRemote sensingAtmospheric sciencesMeteorologyTest (biology)AstrobiologyAerospace engineeringMathematicsGeologyGeographyGeometryEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This first part of the dataset contains the atmospheric and surface conditions of Hawaii test scene (39320E) used for pre-launch studies of EarthCARE’s retrieval algorithms and data management system. The data are produced by Environment and Climate Change Canada's Global Environmental Multi-scale (GEM) NWP model (Côté et al., 1998, Girard et al., 2014). The surface albedo climatology is based MODIS’s MCD43GF 1 km resolution bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) product for the period 2002 to 2013 (Schaaf et al. 2002). Please refer to the second part of Hawaii scene dataset for the mass content and effective radius of hydrometeors and aerosols, and the third part of the dataset for the number concentration of hydrometeors and aerosols, as well as the data of vertical wind speed. The Hawaii test frame is 6200 km long and 200 km wide with horizontal grid-spacing of 250 km and 57 vertical layers. The simulation is initialized at 12:00 UTC 23-Jun-2015 and saved at 00h00 UTC on 24-Jun-2015. This frame crosses the central Pacific Ocean, near Hawaii, with a mesoscale convective system (MCS) in its center, clear skies in the north and south part of the frame, and a weak frontal system at its southern extremity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSpacecraft Design and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207