Bibliographic record
Abstract
The clinometer, inclinomete is used to measure angles on land. This information can then be used to determine such things as the heights of objects. Clinometers have been around for a long time. They initially began as a simple plummet tool (a string with a weight at the end of it), but by the end of the 18th century it became a more sophisticated tool that included such things as bubble levels, sights and telescopes. This particular clinometer was designed and used by Meteorology Services of Canada to determine cloud base height from the early 1950s to 1958. It was made out of cast iron and brass parts and was painted black. Note: The model is meant to be viewed in a virtual environment using computer software. To construct your own clinometer please visit ingeniumcanada.org/education/3D-clinometer Our terms of use can be found [here](https://ingeniumcanada.org/ingenium/doc/content/cstmc/CSTMC%20terms%20of%20use%203D%20ENG.pdf). Source: Objaverse 1.0 / Sketchfab
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.082 | 0.145 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".