MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393566226 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6954160

Database of Accreting Binary Simulations

2022· dataset· en· W4393566226 on OpenAlexaff
Chatrik Singh Mangat, Natalia Ivanova, Kenny Van

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicSimulation Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDatabaseBinary numberComputer scienceMathematicsArithmetic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present <strong>DABS</strong> (Database of Accreting Binary Simulations), an open-access database of modelled Low Mass X-ray Binaries (LMXBs). DABS has been created using evolutionary tracks of neutron star and black hole LMXBs, spanning a large set of initial conditions for the accretor mass, donor mass, and orbital period. The LMXBs are evolved with the Convection and Rotation Boosted Magnetic Braking prescription. The most important asset of this online database is the tool <strong>PEAS</strong> (Progenitor Extractor for Accreting Systems) https://github.com/ChatrikMangat/progenlmxb. This tool can be used to predict the progenitors of any user-entered LMXB system and view their properties before the start of mass transfer. This prediction can facilitate preliminary searches for the progenitors of observed LMXBs, which can help in streamlining further detailed analyses. The PEAS tool can also be used to constrain population synthesis techniques that specialize in supernova kicks in binaries and common envelope outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4500.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.154
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSimulation Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207