MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393570420 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7555300

Comparison of tetracycline and temperature sensitive GAL80 transgenes with UAS-lacZ

2023· dataset· en· W4393570420 on OpenAlexaff
Taylor Barwell, Sofia Geld, Laurent Seroude

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransgeneTetracyclinelac operonBiologyGeneticsGenePlasmidAntibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ß-galactosidase specific activity was measured during development and aging (Experimental workflow) as described in STAR Protocols 3, 101843, 2022. Two different muscle-specific GAL4 drivers, Mef2-Gal4 (BDSC:27390) and DJ694 (BDSC: 8176), were each crossed with a second chromosome insertion of UAS-lacZ (Bg2) (BDSC: 1776), Bg2 recombined with third chromosome insertions of TetOFF-GAL80 (3.3+1077, PeerJ 5:e4167), and Bg2 recombined with third chromosome insertions of GAL80ts (BDSC:7017). Flies were raised at 20˚C and 29℃. Two independent sets of parents were used for each cross (biological replicates 1 and 2). After 2-3 days, parents were flipped into a new bottles (technical replicates 1 and 2 reported as replicate 3 and 4 in the dataset). CPRG and Bradford assays were performed on whole animal for the third instar larvae (L3), early pupae (EP) and late pupae (LP) stages, and on dissected thoraces for adult stages. Five extracts (1 individual in each) were measured per experimental replicate. Raw microplate readings are available upon request.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.226

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0680.057

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207