ImageNet-Cartoon and ImageNet-Drawing: two domain shift datasets for ImageNet
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Benchmarking the robustness to distribution shifts traditionally relies on dataset collection which is typically laborious and expensive, in particular for datasets with a large number of classes like ImageNet. An exception to this procedure is ImageNet-C (Hendrycks & Dietterich, 2019), a dataset created by applying common real-world corruptions at different levels of intensity to the (clean) ImageNet images. Inspired by this work, we introduce ImageNet-Cartoon and ImageNet-Drawing, two datasets constructed by converting ImageNet images into cartoons and colored pencil drawings, using a GAN framework (Wang & Yu, 2020) and simple image processing (Lu et al., 2012), respectively. This repository contains ImageNet-Cartoon and ImageNet-Drawing. Checkout the official GitHub Repo for the code on how to reproduce the datasets. If you find this useful in your research, please consider citing: @inproceedings{imagenetshift,<br> title={ImageNet-Cartoon and ImageNet-Drawing: two domain shift datasets for ImageNet},<br> author={Tiago Salvador and Adam M. Oberman},<br> booktitle={ICML Workshop on Shift happens: Crowdsourcing metrics and test datasets beyond ImageNet.},<br> year={2022}<br> }
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.072 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".