MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393572987 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7750695

Animal Communicator International Scan of Books, Websites, Animal Communicator Directory

2025· dataset· en· W4393572987 on OpenAlexaffabout
M. J. Barrett, Laura Zmud, Carolyn Hoessler, S. Zahra Ghoreishi, Sydney Kuppenbender

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAnimal and Plant Science Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDirectoryComputer scienceWorld Wide WebLibrary scienceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Four datasets are included focusing on animal communicators (AC): practitioners of intuitive interspecies communication (IIC). Dataset #1: International English language websites data set (n = 400). To be included and coded, websites had to meet the following 3 criteria: (1) have an English language version of the website, (2) currently offer private AC consultations, and (3) be identified before website analysis was determined comprehensive enough to represent the international scope of AC (Oct. 30, 2020). CITE AS: Barrett, M. J., Zmud, L., Mathur, A., & Hoessler, C. (2024). Animal communicator website scan [Data set]. Zenodo. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.7750695 Dataset #2: International English language published books. Total books (n = 191): Books were identified through internet searches, including searches on Amazon and used bookstores such as Abe Books, from practicing AC websites, and from the directory: Book Authority Website for “53 Best Animal Communication Books of All Time,” https://bookauthority.org/books/best-animal-communication-books. Dataset includes books’ titles, descriptions, front and back covers and tables of contents where available. Where it was not clear whether the author was an animal communicator who consulted with clients, we did additional online searches to make this determination. All books had an English language printed copy of the book. We excluded books that were available in electronic copy only. We expanded our initial content inclusion criteria used in the website report beyond individuals currently offering consultations as professional animal communicators to include: (1) professional animal communicators who have since retired; (2) individuals who work intensively with animals in other capacities such as healing, but also report instances of IIC; (3) individuals who may not have worked as professional animal communicators, but write about their own lived experience of the phenomena; and (4) books written by individuals who are not ACs but have interviewed ACs. Where a book was written by two authors, or in some cases, an animal communicator with an additional author, we included both authors in our formal citation. Books were written by ACs who offered professional services (182), or authors who were not ACs (9). CITE AS: Barrett, M. J., Mathur, A., & Ghoreishi, Z., Hoessler, C., Kuppenbender, S. (2024). Animal communicator Book Scan [Data set]. Zenodo. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.7750695 Dataset #3: Directory of practicing ACs (1990-2011; n = 80 issues). To provide a snapshot of growth in numbers of practitioners over time, we compiled listings of ACs published in the Animal Communicator Directory from Species Link: The Journal of Interspecies Telepathic Communication. From 1990-2011, the publication included a directory of practicing ACs; after 2011, the directory went fully online, and data from each year is not available. CITE AS: Barrett, M.J. & Hoessler, C. (2022). Animal Communicator Directory. [Data set]. Zenodo. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.7750695 Dataset #4: Reference List of 15 Analyzed Animal Communicator Books with formal or informal “How-To” Sections. Compiled to identify and summarize the ways in which ACs were describing essential processes for conducting a successful intuitive communication session with animals, and thus provide an overview of what happens in an IIC session. Selection criteria: We were seeking succinct summaries from ACs. The intent was not to dig into and analyze processes in detail, but rather to summarize and synthesize the essential processes and steps as the ACs were reporting them. As such, it was beyond the scope of this study to analyze reported example communications or analyze processes in books where the entirety of the book was describing communications with animals. Publication date range: 1998-2019. Close to 300 pages were analyzed. The actual "how-to" excerpts are not included as they are subject to copyright. CITE AS: Barrett, M.J. & Kuppenbender, S. (2022). Reference List of 15 Analyzed Animal Communicator Books [Data set]. Zenodo. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.7750695 For further information on data collection and analysis details contact M.J. Barrett, PhD. mj.barrett@usask.ca Funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Insight Development Grant: Deepening Connection in Pursuit of Environmental Sustainability: Assessing a Promising Lever for Shifting Assumptions of Separation (Grant # 430-2019-01023).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0570.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicAnimal and Plant Science EducationFrench-language works237,207