MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393580122 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3350797

Network data for the paper: Intellectual and social similarity among scholarly journals.

2019· dataset· en· W4393580122 on OpenAlexaff
Alberto Baccini, Lucio Barabesi, Mahdi Khelfaoui, Yves Gingras

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2019
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWeb visibility and informetrics
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSimilarity (geometry)Social network analysisComputer scienceData scienceInformation retrievalWorld Wide WebSocial mediaArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Network data used for the analysis contained in Baccini A, Barabesi L, Gingras Y, Kalfaoui M (2019) Intellectual and social similarity among scholarly journals. An exploratory comparison of the networks of editors, authors and co-citations. Data are in .net format for Pajek software CC indicates co-citation network. IA indicated Interlocking authorship network. IE indicates interlocking editorship network. Stat is for statistics; Econ is for economics; ILS is for information and library science.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0060.005
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.208
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.121 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicWeb visibility and informetricsFrench-language works237,207