MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393591712 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10257838

Generative AI for designing and validating easily synthesizable and structurally novel antibiotics: Data and Models

2024· dataset· en· W4393591712 on OpenAlexaff
Kyle Swanson, Gary Liu, Denise B. Catacutan, Autumn Arnold, James Zou, Jonathan Stokes

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenerative grammarComputer scienceProgramming languageArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This repository contains data and models used in the following paper. Swanson, K., Liu, G., Catacutan, D., Zou, J. & Stokes, J. Generative AI for designing and validating easily synthesizable and structurally novel antibiotics. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2024. The data and models are meant to be used with the SyntheMol code. More details about how to use the data and models with the code are available here. The Data.zip file has the following structure. Note that the numbers for the Data subdirectories correspond to the supplementary data numbers in the paper (e.g., 1_training_data corresponds to Supplementary Data 1). Data 1_training_data: The Acinetobacter baumannii inhibition data used to train antibiotic property prediction models. 2_chembl: Known antibiotic and antibacterial molecules from ChEMBL, which are used to compute the novelty of generated antibiotic candidates. 4_real_space: Data files and statistics for the Enamine REAL Space. The molecular building blocks file is version 2021 q3-4 while all other REAL Space details are computed from the full enumerated REAL space version 2022 q1-2 (downloaded on August 30, 2022). 5_generations_clogp: Compounds generated by SyntheMol using Chemprop models trained to predict cLogP. 6_generations_chemprop: Compounds generated by SyntheMol using Chemprop models trained to predict A. baumannii inhibition. 7_generations_chemprop_rdkit: Compounds generated by SyntheMol using Chemprop-RDKit models trained to predict A. baumannii inhibition. 8_generations_random_forest: Compounds generated by SyntheMol using random forest models trained to predict A. baumannii inhibition. 9_synthesized: Information on the 58 SyntheMol-generated compounds that were successfully synthesized by Enamine. The Models.zip file contains one folder for each model used in the paper. Note that each model is technically an ensemble of ten individual models, so each directory contains ten model files.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.041

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicComputational Drug Discovery MethodsFrench-language works237,207