MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393603689 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5257995

EMOPIA: A Multi-Modal Pop Piano Dataset For Emotion Recognition and Emotion-based Music Generation

2021· dataset· en· W4393603689 on OpenAlexaff
Hsiao-Tzu Hung, Joann Ching, SeungHeon Doh, Nabin Kim, Juhan Nam, Yi‐Hsuan Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPianoModalEmotion recognitionSpeech recognitionPsychologyMusic and emotionComputer scienceCommunicationCognitive psychologyArtMusic historyMusic educationArt historyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EMOPIA (pronounced ‘yee-mò-pi-uh’) dataset is a shared multi-modal (audio and MIDI) database focusing on perceived emotion in <strong>pop piano music</strong>, to facilitate research on various tasks related to music emotion. The dataset contains <strong>1,087</strong> music clips from 387 songs and <strong>clip-level</strong> emotion labels annotated by four dedicated annotators. For more detailed information about the dataset, please refer to our paper: <strong>EMOPIA: A Multi-Modal Pop Piano Dataset For Emotion Recognition and Emotion-based Music Generation</strong>. <strong>File Description</strong> <em><strong>midis/</strong></em>: midi clips transcribed using GiantMIDI. Filename `Q1_xxxxxxx_2.mp3`: Q1 means this clip belongs to Q1 on the V-A space; xxxxxxx is the song ID on YouTube, and the `2` means this clip is the 2nd clip taken from the full song. <em><strong>metadata/</strong></em>: metadata from YouTube. (Got when crawling) <em><strong>songs_lists/</strong></em>: YouTube URLs of songs. <em><strong>tagging_lists/</strong></em>: raw tagging result for each sample. <em><strong>label.csv</strong></em>: metadata that records filename, 4Q label, and annotator. <em><strong>metadata_by_song.csv</strong></em>: list all the clips by the song. Can be used to create the train/val/test splits to avoid the same song appear in both train and test. <em><strong>scripts/prepare_split.ipynb:</strong></em> the script to create train/val/test splits and save them to csv files. ------ <strong>2.2 Update</strong> Add tagging files in <em><strong>tagging_lists/</strong></em> that are missing in the previous version. Add <em><strong>timestamps.json</strong></em> for easier usage. It records all the timestamps in dict format. You can see <em><strong>scripts/load_timestamp.ipynb</strong></em> for the format example. Add <em><strong>scripts/timestamp2clip.py</strong></em>: After the raw audio are crawled and put in <em><strong>audios/raw</strong></em>, you can use this script to get audio clips. The script will read <em><strong>timestamps.json</strong></em> and use the timestamp to extract clips. The clips will be saved to <em><strong>audios/seg</strong> </em>folder. remove 7 midi files that were added by mistake, and also corrected the number in <em><strong>metadata_by_song.csv</strong></em>. <strong>2.1 Update</strong> Add one file and one folder: <em><strong>key_mode_tempo.csv</strong></em>: key, mode, and tempo information extracted from files. <strong><em>CP_events/</em></strong>: CP events used in our paper. Extracted using this script, and add the emotion event to the front. Modify one folder: The <strong><em>REMI_events/</em></strong> files in version 2.0 contain some information that is not related to the paper, so remove it. <strong>2.0 Update</strong> Add two new folders: <strong><em>corpus/</em></strong>: processed data that following the preprocessing flow. (Please notice that although we have <code>1078</code> clips in our dataset, we lost some clips during steps 1~4 of the flow, so the final number of clips in this <strong><code>corpus</code></strong> is <code>1052</code>, and that's the number we used for training the generative model.) <strong><em>REMI_events/</em></strong>: REMI event for each midi file. They are generated using this script. -------- <strong>Cite this dataset</strong> <pre><code>@inproceedings{{EMOPIA}, author = {Hung, Hsiao-Tzu and Ching, Joann and Doh, Seungheon and Kim, Nabin and Nam, Juhan and Yang, Yi-Hsuan}, title = {{MOPIA}: A Multi-Modal Pop Piano Dataset For Emotion Recognition and Emotion-based Music Generation}, booktitle = {Proc. Int. Society for Music Information Retrieval Conf.}, year = {2021} }</code></pre>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.300
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMusic and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207