MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393627574 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3819585

Radio Frequency Interference (RFI)

2020· dataset· en· W4393627574 on OpenAlexaff
Sahar Ujan, René Landry, Néda Navidi

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Optimization
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterference (communication)Electromagnetic interferenceCo-channel interferenceTelecommunicationsComputer scienceChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this dataset, Signal of Interest (SoI) is a real-time video stream that is transmitted using DVB-S2 standards in four modulation types including (QPSK, 8/16/32 APSK). Further, this SoI combined by three well-known jamming signals namely, Continuous Wave Interference (CWI), Multiple CWI (MCWI), and Chirp Interference (CI). This dataset includes 300 samples per modulation type for each type of signal. Therefore, totally there are 4800 samples in the dataset and each sample is a vector of size 1 by 32488 (8ms) at sample frequency 40 Hz. Also, AWGN power is -140 dBm which is approximately equal to SNR=9 dB. More importantly, SoI is modulated and processed by GNU radio and transmitted using a Universal Software Radio Peripheral (USRP-N210). In GNU radio, the modulation type and amplitude of the transmitted signal can be easily adjusted. A SatCom Emulator (RTLogic T400) is used for modeling a real-time communication channel. The programmatic control of the channel simulator is facilitated over an Ethernet connection using a control protocol or optional plugin to STK software. The Channel Simulator produces IF/RF signals with extracting signal characteristics for any scenario. The Kratos STK plugin provides real-time, phase-continuous control of the channel simulator when playing STK scenarios. Further, the generated jamming signals (CWI, MCWI, and CI) are transmitted using a NanoBee modem and combined to SoI by a combiner. Finally, the combined signal is received by a MegaBee modem. Notably, in this dataset, each jammer indicates a combination of SoI with that jammer, as an instance "CWI_16APSK " refers to SoI (16APSK)+CWI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicAntenna Design and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207