Supporting information, WRF output, and processed WRF files used for the generation of the manuscript "Observational and modelling analysis of Canada's only F5/EF5 tornado"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
WRF simulation output and processed files used to generate the figures and calculations in the manuscript "Observational and modelling analysis of Canada's only F5/EF5 tornado". Two zipped folders are attached, one is from the original control simulation with the microphysics scheme on (MP), and the other is from the experimental simulation with the microphysics scheme turned off (NOMP). Each simulation zipped folder includes sub-directories containing the processed observed and simulated surface station data, surface wet-bulb potential temperature, cross sections (the MP simulation only), and convective parameter fields at 2100 UTC 22 June 2007. A supplemental material in the form of a movie showing the radar observation between 2000 UTC 22 June 2007 and 0000 UTC 23 June 2007 is also attached. See the manuscript's Figure 5 caption for more information on the data shown in the animation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.177 | 0.090 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".