Microseismic source parameters from induced seismicity in the Horn river basin (British Columbia) [Dataset]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is a database of results linked to the associated manuscript (Klinger and Werner, 2021) which has been submitted to Geophysical Journal International and is currently in review. We report magnitudes, corner frequencies and stress drops of microseismic events linked to fault reactivation during hydro-fracturing operations in the Horn river basin (British Columbia), as well as the corresponding uncertainties for these parameters. Stress drops are calculated using a Brune model (Brune, 1970) and uncertainties are calculated using a bootstrapping technique. Prior to publication please cite this database using the following two references: Klinger, A.G., Werner, M.J. (2021). Stress drops of hydraulic fracturing induced microseismicity in the Horn River basin: Challenges at high frequencies recorded by borehole geophones. Manuscript submitted to Geophysical Journal International . Klinger, A.G., Werner, M.J. (2021). Microseismic source parameters from induced seismicity in the Horn river basin (British Columbia) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5603835.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".