MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393697952 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5506689

MPOSE2021: a Dataset for Short-time Pose-based Human Action Recognition

2021· dataset· en· W4393697952 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vittorio Mazzia, Simone Angarano, Francesco Salvetti, Federico Angelini, Marcello Chiaberge

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHuman Pose and Action Recognition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAction recognitionAction (physics)Computer scienceArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<strong>MPOSE2021</strong> MPOSE2021 is a Dataset for short-time pose-based Human Action Recognition (HAR). MPOSE2021 is specifically designed to perform short-time Human Action Recognition, as presented in [12]. MPOSE2021 is developed as an evolution of the MPOSE Dataset [1-3]. It is made by human pose data detected by OpenPose [4] and Posenet [11] on popular datasets for HAR, i.e. Weizmann [5], i3DPost [6], IXMAS [7], KTH [8], UTKinetic-Action3D (RGB only) [9] and UTD-MHAD (RGB only) [10], alongside original video datasets, i.e. ISLD and ISLD-Additional-Sequences [1]. Since these datasets have heterogenous action labels, each dataset labels is remapped to a common and homogeneous list of actions. To properly use MPOSE2021 and all the functionalities developed by the authors, we recommend using the official repository MPOSE2021_Dataset. <strong>Dataset Description</strong> The repository contains 3 datasets (namely 1, 2 and 3) which consist of the same data divided in different train/test splits. Each dataset contains X and y numpy arrays for both training and testing. X has the following shape: <pre>(number_of_samples, time_window, number_of_keypoints, x_y_p)</pre> where time_window = 30 number_of_keypoints = 17 (PoseNet) or 13 (OpenPose) x_y_p contains 2D keypoint coordinates (x,y) in the original video reference frame and the keypoint confidence (p &lt;= 1) <strong>References</strong> [1] F. Angelini, Z. Fu, Y. Long, L. Shao and S. M. Naqvi, "2D Pose-based Real-time Human Action Recognition with Occlusion-handling," in IEEE Transactions on Multimedia. URL: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&amp;arnumber=8853267&amp;isnumber=4456689 [2] F. Angelini, J. Yan and S. M. Naqvi, "Privacy-preserving Online Human Behaviour Anomaly Detection Based on Body Movements and Objects Positions," ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Brighton, United Kingdom, 2019, pp. 8444-8448. URL: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&amp;arnumber=8683026&amp;isnumber=8682151 [3] F. Angelini and S. M. Naqvi, "Joint RGB-Pose Based Human Action Recognition for Anomaly Detection Applications," 2019 22th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION), Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2019, pp. 1-7. URL: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&amp;arnumber=9011277&amp;isnumber=9011156 [4] Cao, Zhe, et al. "OpenPose: realtime multi-person 2D pose estimation using Part Affinity Fields." IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 43.1 (2019): 172-186. [5] Gorelick, Lena, et al. "Actions as space-time shapes." IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 29.12 (2007): 2247-2253. [6] Starck, Jonathan, and Adrian Hilton. "Surface capture for performance-based animation." IEEE computer graphics and applications 27.3 (2007): 21-31. [7] Weinland, Daniel, Mustafa Özuysal, and Pascal Fua. "Making action recognition robust to occlusions and viewpoint changes." European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010. [8] Schuldt, Christian, Ivan Laptev, and Barbara Caputo. "Recognizing human actions: a local SVM approach." Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR 2004. Vol. 3. IEEE, 2004. [9] L. Xia, C.C. Chen and JK Aggarwal. "View invariant human action recognition using histograms of 3D joints", 2012 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 20-27, 2012. [10] C. Chen, R. Jafari, and N. Kehtarnavaz. "UTD-MHAD: A Multimodal Dataset for Human Action Recognition Utilizing a Depth Camera and a Wearable Inertial Sensor". Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Canada, 2015. [11] G. Papandreou, T. Zhu, L.C. Chen, S. Gidaris, J. Tompson, K. Murphy. "PersonLab: Person Pose Estimation and Instance Segmentation with a Bottom-Up, Part-Based, Geometric Embedding Model". Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2018, pp. 269-286 [12] V. Mazzia, S. Angarano, F. Salvetti, F. Angelini, M. Chiaberge. "Action Transformer: A Self-Attention Model for Short-Time Human Action Recognition". arXiv preprint (https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.00606), 2021.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicHuman Pose and Action RecognitionFrench-language works237,207