MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4393728153 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6321323

Model Lagrangian trajectories and deformation data analyzed in the Sea Ice Rheology Experiment - Part I

2022· dataset· en· W4393728153 on OpenAlexaff
Amélie Bouchat, Nils Hutter, Jérôme Chanut, Frédéric Dupont, Dmitry Dukhovskoy, Gilles Garric, Younjoo Lee, Jean‐François Lemieux, Camille Lique, Martin Lösch, Wieslaw Maslowski, Paul G. Myers, Einar Ólason, Pierre Rampal, Till Rasmussen, Claude Talandier, Bruno Tremblay, Qiang Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaGDG EnvironnementEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRheologyLagrangianDeformation (meteorology)GeologyGeodesyMechanicsMathematicsOceanographyPhysicsApplied mathematicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Model Lagrangian trajectories and deformation estimates for sea-ice models participating in the Sea Ice Rheology Experiment (SIREx) - Part I. Model Lagrangian trajectories are integrated offline, starting on January 1st with all available raw RGPS cells positions (interpolated to January 1st 00:00:00 UTC). The trajectories are advected at an hourly time step with the models daily velocity output until March 31st. The trajectories are then sampled at a 3-day interval to match the RGPS composite time stamps, and the velocity derivatives (deformation) are calculated using the line integral approximations on the cells' contour. All model trajectories and Lagrangian deformation data therefore have nominal temporal and spatial scales of 3-days and 10-km (same as the RGPS composite), regardless of the original resolution of the model output. The model Lagrangian deformation estimates form the basis quantity for the statistical and spatio-temporal scaling analysis presented in Bouchat et al., Sea Ice Rheology Experiment (SIREx), Part I: Scaling and statistical properties of sea-ice deformation fields, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans (2022). This paper also provides further details on the model trajectory integration and deformation calculation. There is one netCDF file per model, per year (1997 and/or 2008). Data are organized in matrices where the (i,j) indices are the Lagrangian cells identifier. This allows us to keep track of neighbouring cells for the scaling analysis. See below for more information on what variables are included in the files, their structure, and how to cite. 1. File naming convention "< Model simulation label >" + _ + "deformation" + _ + "< year >" 2. Variables included (x1,y1), (x1,y2), (x3,y3), (x4,y4): Position of the cells' corners (Lagrangian trajectories) - (meters); A: Cells' area - (meters squared); dudx, dudy, dvdx, dvdy: Cell's velocity derivatives (strain rates/deformation) - (1/seconds); d_dudx, d_dudy, d_dvdx, d_dvdy: Trajectory error on cells' velocity derivatives - (1/seconds); time: Day of year. *Note: the model trajectories are terminated if they move within 100 km from land. Before computing deformation statistics to compare with RGPS composite data, one should mask both deformation sets to only keep cells available in both the model and RGPS data sets. 3. Variable structure All variables (except time) are matrices with axes (it, i, j ), where it is the time stamp/iteration and i,j are the cells identifiers. See below for how the cells are defined: |--------------------------------------------------------------> j-axis | | (x1_ij,y1_ij) o ------------------- o (x2_ij,y2_ij) | | | | | A_ij or dudx_ij | | | | | (x4_ij,y4_ij) o ------------------- o (x3_ij,y3_ij) | | Vi-axis Hence, coordinates are repeated between neighbouring cells, for example: (x2_ij,y2_ij) = (x1_ij+1,y1_ij+1) and (x4_ij,y4_ij) = (x1_i+1j,y1_i+1j) 4. Recommended citation usage If all simulations included in the current archive are used in a future study, we ask to cite this archive and the SIREx paper (Bouchat et al., 2022). If only selected simulations are used, we ask to cite both this archive and the reference paper(s) applying to the selected simulation(s) (as stated indicated in Table 1 of the SIREx papers).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→