Baseline assemblies for "ntLink: a toolkit for de novo genome assembly scaffolding and mapping using long reads" protocol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ntLink is a flexible de novo genome scaffolding toolkit which can be run in various modes depending on the desired user output, with multiple new functionalities recently introduced. Here, we provide the baseline assembly datasets used in the ntLink protocol paper "ntLink: a toolkit for de novo genome assembly scaffolding and mapping using long reads". The provided assemblies are ABySS (short-read) and Flye (long-read) assemblies of Caenorhabditis elegans genome sequencing data. The ABySS (v2.1.4) assembly utilized paired-end short reads (accession DRR008444), and was run with the following parameters: k=64 l=40 s=1000 q=15 B=10G j=8 kc=3 H=4 S=1000-10000 N=9.The C. elegans Flye (v2.5) assembly was run using Oxford Nanopore long reads (accession SRR10028109) and the following parameters: --nano-raw SRR10028109.fastq -g100m -t48.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.064 | 0.097 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".