CREMP: Conformer-rotamer ensembles of macrocyclic peptides for machine learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CREMP: A resource generated for the rapid development and evaluation of machine learning models for macrocyclic peptides. CREMP contains 36,198 unique macrocyclic peptides and their high-quality structural ensembles generated using the Conformer-Rotamer Ensemble Sampling Tool (CREST). Altogether, this dataset contains nearly 31.3 million unique macrocycle geometries, each annotated with energies derived from semi-empirical tight-binding DFT calculations. We anticipate that this dataset will enable the development of machine learning models that can improve peptide design and optimization for novel therapeutics. We provide the data in two available formats, either as Python pickle files, which provide quick read access with RDKit version 2022.09.5 or later, and as text-based SDF files with associated metadata in JSON format. Each file is named based on its amino acid sequence, with residues separated by periods, using standard one-letter codes with lowercase letters representing D-amino acids and "Me" prefixes representing N-methylated amino acids. The sequences are in no particular order, e.g., "C.R.E.M.P" and "R.E.M.P.C" correspond to the same peptide macrocycle. The filename extensions are ".pickle", ".sdf", and ".json". Each file in the “pickle” folder contains a Python dictionary with amino acid sequence, SMILES, CREST metadata, and a single RDKit molecule object containing all conformers. All files in the folder were compressed into a single “pickle.tar.gz” archive. In the “sdf_and_json” folder, each individual SDF file contains all conformers, each associated with its own JSON file that contains CREST metadata. Similarly, all are compressed into another single archive, “sdf_and_json.tar.bz2”. A single summary CSV file is also provided containing ”sequence”, “smiles”, “num_monomers”, “num_atoms”, “num_heavy_atoms”, along with the CREST metadata “totalconfs”, “uniqueconfs”, “lowestenergy”, “poplowestpct”, “temperature”, “ensembleenergy”, “ensembleentropy”, and “ensemblefreeenergy”. The number of unique conformers with different 3D structures is given by “uniqueconfs”, while “totalconfs” includes the number of rotamers in addition. The unzipped sizes of the archives are approximately 32 GB for "pickle.tar.gz" and 210 GB for "sdf_and_json.tar.bz2". If you encounter errors when trying to load the pickle files, please make sure your RDKit version is at least 2022.09.5. If that doesn't work, try other Python versions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".