Supplemental 3D Model Data - New Insights Into The Evolutionary History Of Fungi From A 407 Million Year Old Blastocladiomycota-Like Fossil Showing Multiple Sporangia And An Extensive Hyphal Network (Spiersview And Vaxml Format)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three-dimensional reconstruction models of Fungi from a 407 million year old blastocladiomycota-like fossil showing multiple sporangia and an extensive hyphal network in SPIERSView and VAXML format. 2D and 3D (Red/Cyan) images also provided as a PDF. Notes: SPIERSView file (.SPV) models can conveniently be viewed using the SPIERSView software, freely available in both Windows and Mac versions from http://www.spiers‐software.org. However, note that low-performance computers may not possess a sufficiently powerful graphics card to render and rotate the model. VAXML file format models are saved as a ZIP-compressed VAXML datasets. VAXML uses one or more .STL files to define the geometry of objects that comprise the dataset, together with one .VAXML file that provides metadata on the dataset as a whole, and specifies how the .STL files should be put together. We recommend using the free SPIERS software to view this model format (http://spiers-software.org/). However, .STL files can be opened independently in several freely available software programs (e.g. MeshLab, Blender). Additional information on the VAXML format can be found here: http://spiers-software.org/VAXML.htm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.374 | 0.132 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".