Model outputs from the study "A scalable framework for soil property mapping tested across a highly diverse tropical data-scarce region"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Model outputs from the study "A scalable framework for soil property mapping tested across a highly diverse tropical data-scarce region". The study is published as open access and can be found at the following link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950289625000326 The file "SWAT_USERSOIL.csv" was included to facilitate the assimilation of the soil mapping data into the Soil & Water Assessment Tool (SWAT, https://swat.tamu.edu/) for hydrological modeling. Regarding the raster files, please note: a) All values in these datasets have been multiplied by 10,000 to optimize file sizes. b) Files are named using the variable acronym, followed by the corresponding soil layer. For outputs derived from pedotransfer functions (PTFs), the PTF reference is appended after the variable acronym. c) Available data decrease with increasing soil layer number. This occurs because not all locations (grid cells) have the same soil depth or number of soil layers. If you have any questions about the dataset or its use, please don't hesitate to contact us.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".