A Comprehensive Analysis of Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentation in Different Image Domains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<strong>Content</strong> This repository contains pre-trained computer vision models, data labels, and images used in the pre-print publication "A Comprehensive Analysis of Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentation in Different Image Domains": <em>ADPdevkit</em>: a folder containing the 50 validation ("tuning") set and 50 evaluation ("segtest") set of images from the Atlas of Digital Pathology database formatted in the VOC2012 style--the full database of 17,668 images is available for download from the original website <em>VOCdevkit</em>: a folder containing the relevant files for the PASCAL VOC2012 Segmentation dataset, with both the trainaug and test sets <em>DGdevkit</em>: a folder containing the 803 test images of the DeepGlobe Land Cover challenge dataset formatted in the VOC2012 style <em>cues</em>: a folder containing the pre-generated weak cues for ADP, VOC2012, and DeepGlobe datasets, as required for the SEC and DSRG methods <em>models_cnn</em>: a folder containing the pre-trained CNN models <em>models_wsss</em>: a folder containing the pre-trained SEC, DSRG, and IRNet models, along with dense CRF settings <strong>More information</strong> For more information, please refer to the following article. <strong>Please cite this article when using the data set.</strong> @misc{chan2019comprehensive,<br> title={A Comprehensive Analysis of Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentation in Different Image Domains},<br> author={Lyndon Chan and Mahdi S. Hosseini and Konstantinos N. Plataniotis},<br> year={2019},<br> eprint={1912.11186},<br> archivePrefix={arXiv},<br> primaryClass={cs.CV}<br> } For the full code released on GitHub, please visit the repository at: https://github.com/lyndonchan/wsss-analysis <strong>Contact</strong> For questions, please contact:<br> Lyndon Chan<br> lyndon.chan@mail.utoronto.ca<br> http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1185-7961
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".