MatSciML: A Broad, Multi-Task Benchmark for Solid-State Materials Modeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose MatSci ML, a novel benchmark for modeling MATerials SCIence using Machine Learning (MatSci ML) methods focused on solid-state materials with periodic crystal structures. Applying machine learning methods to solid-state materials is a nascent field with substantial fragmentation largely driven by the great variety of datasets used to develop machine learning models. This fragmentation makes comparing the performance and generalizability of different methods difficult, thereby hindering overall research progress in the field. Building on top of open-source datasets, including large-scale datasets like the OpenCatalyst, OQMD, NOMAD, the Carolina Materials Database, and Materials Project, the MatSci ML benchmark provides a diverse set of materials systems and properties data for model training and evaluation, including simulated energies, atomic forces, material bandgaps, as well as classification data for crystal symmetries via space groups. The diversity of properties in MatSci ML makes the implementation and evaluation of multi-task learning algorithms for solid-state materials possible, while the diversity of datasets facilitates the development of new, more generalized algorithms and methods across multiple datasets. In the multi-dataset learning setting, MatSci ML enables researchers to combine observations from multiple datasets to perform joint prediction of common properties, such as energy and forces. Using MatSci ML, we evaluate the performance of different graph neural networks and equivariant point cloud networks on several benchmark tasks spanning single task, multitask, and multi-data learning scenarios. Our open-source code is available at https://github.com/IntelLabs/matsciml.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".