Perspectives and experiences of Covid-19: Two Irish studies of families in disadvantaged communities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Data files related to the manuscript <em>Perspectives and experiences of Covid-19: Two Irish studies of families in disadvantaged communities</em>. The manuscript includes two studies. The following materials are shared below. Study 1: - Qualitative data (Microsoft Office Excel file) - Codebook for coding the qualitative data developed through content analysis (pdf file) Study 2: - Qualitative data (Microsoft Office Excel file) Data are named using the following naming convention: Project acronym_Date (YYYYMMDD)_Study_Type of data_Type of participant_Version number of the file. Both studies in the manuscript were developed by the Childhood Development Initiative (CDI), Dublin, Ireland. Study 1 was conducted within the project PEAR_EC, that has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 890925. Study 2 was conducted within the Child Poverty research project, funded by Tusla under the Area Based Childhood funding and the Child and Youth Participation Initiatives grant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.041 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".