Geometric Control on Seismic Rupture and Earthquake Sequence along the Yingxiu-Beichuan Fault with Implications for the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquak
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 65000 years seismic sequence is numerical simulated using TriBIE on the unplanar fault plane with variation normal stress. The code is now available in an open-source Git-hub project, https://github.com/daisy20170101/TriBIE/tree/normal_stress_variation. The modeling will output the bianary format files of normal stress, fault slip velocity, shear stress, slip during the interseismic loading and coseismic rupture stage, respectively. Since it is impossible to output the data at every time step, especially for the large-scale fault model. Thus, during the interseismic loading, we set a constant time interval to output data and the t-inter-***.dat file will record every time, when the data is outputted. During coseimic rupture, t-cos-**.dat file records time of outputing data. So, the size of t-inter-**.dat and t-cos-**.dat file is the number of outputting steps.The fault plane is discretized into 3,1440 elements and the simulation is carried out by parallel computing on 6 servers with 120 CPUs . Each CPU will dispose data of 262 elements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".