MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393788169 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6502467

Impact of the PSR J0740+6620 radius constraint on the properties of high-density matter: Neutron star equation of state posterior samples

2022· dataset· en· W4393788169 on OpenAlexaff
Isaac Legred, Katerina Chatziioannou, R. C. Essick, Sophia Han, Philippe Landry

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsPerimeter Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeutron starConstraint (computer-aided design)RADIUSEquation of stateStar (game theory)State (computer science)PhysicsAstrophysicsNuclear physicsComputer scienceComputer securityGeometryMathematicsQuantum mechanicsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Equation of state posterior samples associated with Legred et al., "Impact of the PSR J0740+6620 radius constraint on the properties of high-density matter," Phys. Rev. D 104, 063003 (2021); doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.063003 Three sets of 1e4 samples from the posterior distribution over equations of state are provided. These sets are drawn from the posterior conditioned on different combinations of radio pulsar observations, gravitational wave data, and NICER x-ray measurements. The data release contains the equation of state table and the corresponding table of neutron star observables for each sample. The posterior distributions one can generate from these samples approximate those plotted in Figs. 1-6 of the accompanying paper. Refer to the readme for usage information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchFrench-language works237,207