MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4393788303 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6615457

Data in support of "An exploration of linkage fine-mapping on sequences from case-control studies"

2022· dataset· en· W4393788303 on OpenAlexaff
Payman Nickchi, Charith Karunarathna, Jinko Graham

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinkage (software)Computational biologyComputer scienceControl (management)Data miningBiologyGeneticsArtificial intelligenceGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

These data were simulated for an exploration of linkage fine-mapping on sequences from case-control studies. The scripts to generate and analyze the data are available at https://github.com/SFUStatgen/PBJ0. Queries may be directed to Payman Nickchi at pnickchi@sfu.ca or Charith (Bhagya) Karunarathna at ch757276@dal.ca. README file for All_data directory Directory structure The All_data directory consists of this README file and 500 sub-directories named DatasetX, for X=1 to 500. Within each DatasetX sub-directory are further sub-directories named alt and null containing files named pop_data.RData and sample_data.RData. alt versus null directories The files in the alt and null directories contain the same variant data but different phenotype data. In particular, under the null hypothesis, disease status is simulated at random according to a 5% prevalence in the population, whereas under the alternative hypothesis disease status is simulated according to a penetrance model that depends on causal SNVs. The R script to simulate data under the alternative hypothesis is in the file 1_SimulateData.R in the Github repository https://github.com/SFUStatgen/PBJ0. pop_data.RData and sample_data.RData files The data structures contained in the pop_data.RData and sample_data.RData files are described below. The structure is the same under both the null and alternative hypothesis. pop_data.RData From R, load("pop_data.RData") loads a list named pop_data whose elements describe the population’s haplotype and phenotype data. The list elements are as follows. Variants: a matrix of variants for the population of 6200 haplotypes rows are SNVs, columns are sequences Positions: a data frame of SNV positions rows are SNVs, column 1 is the SNV name and column 2 is the SNV position in base pairs Population.Mapping: a data frame telling us how the sequences are paired into individuals rows are individuals First column 1 is an individual ID from 1,…,3100; columns 2 and 3 are the sequence IDs of the first and second sequence for that individual where the sequence IDs are the column names of the Variants matrix. Genotype.Matrix: a matrix of genotypes (i.e. variant counts) for the 3100 individuals rows are SNVs columns are the individuals causal_region: a vector containing the lower- and upper-limit of the causal region in base pairs. cSNV: a vector containing the IDs of the causal SNVs, where the SNV IDs are the row names of the Variants matrix. DISCRETE: a list with the following elements. CaseIndividuals: vector of IDs of the affected individuals in the population. ControlIndividuals: vector of IDs of the unaffected in the population. BinaryTrait: a vector of trait status (0=unaffected, 1=affected) for each individual. Note: Within the same DatasetX directory, the only difference between the pop_data data structures under the null and alternative hypothesis is the phenotype information contained in their respective DISCRETE list elements. Both the null and alternative pop_data data structure share list elements: Variants, Positions, Population.Mapping, Genotype.Matrix, causal_region and cSNV. sample_data.RData From R, load("sample_data.RData") loads a list whose elements describe the sequences and phenotypes of the sample of 50 affected individuals (cases) and 50 unaffected individuals (controls) from the population. Haps: a list with two elements. sample_haps: a matrix of 200 sequences for the 50 cases and 50 controls. Rows are SNVs and columns are sequences, with the sequences of sampled cases appearing first (i.e. first 100 columns), followed by the sequences of sampled controls (i.e. last 100 columns). Sequences include only those SNVs that are polymorphic in the sample. ccStatus: a vector indicating the case/control status of the individual to which the sequence belongs, with case=1 and control=0. Genos: a list with two elements. sample_genos: a matrix of 100 genotypes for the 50 cases and 50 controls. Rows are SNVs and columns are genotypes, with genotypes of cases appearing first, followed by genotypes of controls. ccStatus: a vector indicating the case/control status of each individual, with case=1 and control=0. Posn: a data frame of SNV positions for each SNV that is polymorphic in the sample. The first column is the SNV name and the second is the SNV position in base pairs. Posn is a subset of pop_data$Positions. poly_cSNV: a vector of IDs for causal SNVs that are polymorphic in the sample. CaseIND: a vector of individual IDs for the case individuals (see pop_data$Population.Mapping). ControlIND: a vector of individual IDs for the control individuals (see pop_data$Population.Mapping). CaseHapID: a vector of IDs for the sequences that belong to cases (see the sequence IDs in the column names of the matrix pop_data$Variants). ControlHapID: a vector of IDs for the sequences that belong to controls (see the sequence IDs in the column names of the matrix pop_data$Variants).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.089
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.183
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.089
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1830.046

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicRNA Research and Splicing→French-language works237,207→