MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393792900 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7693279

Iterative Bleaching Extends Multiplexity (IBEX) Knowledge-Base

2023· dataset· en· W4393792900 on OpenAlexaff
Ziv Yaniv, Ifeanyichukwu U. Anidi, Leanne Arakkal, Armando Arroyo-Mejías, Rebecca T. Beuschel, Katy Börner, Colin J. Chu, Menna R. Clatworthy, Jake Colautti, Joshua Croteau, Walderez O. Dutra, Spencer Fullam, Michael Y. Gerner, Anita Gola, Kenneth J. Gollob, Hiroshi Ichise, Danny Jonigk, Evelyn Kandov, Wolfgang Kastenmüller, Joshua F. E. Koenig, Vitoria M Olyntho, Kartika Padhan, Nathan Richoz, Rochelle M. Shih, Emily Speranza, Sarah A. Teichmann, Tibor Z. Veres, Megan Vierhout, Brianna T. Wachter, Margaret Williams, Ronald N. Germain, Andrea J. Radtke

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBase (topology)Knowledge baseComputer sciencePsychologyArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Iterative Bleaching Extends Multiplexity (IBEX) imaging method is an iterative immunolabeling and chemical bleaching method that enables highly multiplexed imaging of diverse tissues. Development of the IBEX method and related software was led by Dr. Andrea Radtke and Dr. Ziv Yaniv. IBEX and related methods, Ce3D, Ce3D-IBEX, Opal-plex, were originally developed in the laboratory of Dr. Ronald N. Germain, US National Institutes of Health.The IBEX Imaging Community is an international group of scientists committed to sharing knowledge related to multiplexed imaging in a transparent and collaborative manner. This open, global repository is a central resource for reagents, protocols, panels, publications, software, and datasets. In addition to IBEX, we support standard, single cycle multiplexed imaging (Multiplexed 2D imaging), volume imaging of cleared tissues with clearing enhanced 3D (Ce3D), highly multiplexed 3D imaging (Ce3D-IBEX), and extension of the IBEX dye inactivation protocol to the Leica Cell DIVE (Cell DIVE-IBEX). This dataset contains the current state of knowledge with respect to the IBEX microscopy imaging protocol.How to use the Knowledge-Base:Save a copy to your computer.To find a reagent: Open the reagent_resources.csv file found in the data directory. Use a spreadsheet application to filter the columns based on target name, target species, vendor, etc.To view a complete list of fluorescent probes tested by the IBEX imaging community: Open the fluorescent_probes.csv file. This file reports the spectral properties and inactivation conditions of each fluorescent probe.To import publications cited in the Knowledge-Base, import the publications.bib file found in the data directory to your reference manager.To view a local copy of the website: Open the index.md file found in the docs directory using a markdown editor such as the free Visual Studio Code.To view supporting information for a reagent (images, publications, notes): Open a specific target-conjugate-orcid combination under the docs-supporting_material directory structure using a markdown editor. This can also be visualized from the Reagent Resources page and filtered using a catalog number or other unique identifier in your web browser.Join the online IBEX Imaging community and contribute your knowledge. For more details on how to contribute, see these instructions.This research was supported by:The Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and National Cancer Institute, under grants 1ZIAAI001290-02, 1ZIAAI000545-33, 1ZIAAI000758-24, 1ZIAAI000974-16, 1ZIAAI001034-14. The Wellcome Trust, under grant 224586/Z/21/Z. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, under grant 1ZIAAI001343-01.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.065

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionFrench-language works237,207