MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393801890 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7499419

Thermodynamic and hydrological drivers of the subsurface thermal regime in Central Spain: open data and code

2023· dataset· en· W4393801890 on OpenAlexaff
Félix García‐Pereira, J. Fidel González‐Rouco, Thomas Schmid, Camilo Melo‐Aguilar, Cristina Vegas-Cañas, Norman Julius Steinert, Pedro José Roldán‐Gómez, Francisco José Cuesta‐Valero, Almudena García‐García, Hugo Beltrami, Philipp de Vrese

Bibliographic record

VenueDIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGeothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCode (set theory)Open dataOpen waterEnvironmental scienceCode of practiceHydrology (agriculture)GeologyGeographyComputer scienceEngineeringGeotechnical engineeringOceanographyProgramming languageWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quality controlled temperature data at daily resolution at CTS, HRR, HYS, NVC, RSI and SGV and the most relevant codes for data processing used in: García-Pereira, F., González-Rouco, J. F., Schmid, T., Melo-Aguilar, C, Vegas-Cañas, C., Steinert, N. J., Roldán-Gómez, P. J., Cuesta-Valero, F. J., García-García, A., Beltrami, H., and de Vrese, H.: "Thermodynamic and hydrological drivers of the subsurface thermal regime in Central Spain". Earth Surf. Dynam., submitted, 2023. All data can be also freely obtained for research from the original data sources, GuMNet (https://www.ucm.es/gumnet/) and AEMET (https://www.aemet.es/en/datos_abiertos). Further details of the code are available upon request to the corresponding author (Félix García-Pereira, felgar03@ucm.es).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.154

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.175
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC))Same topicGeothermal Energy Systems and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207