The spindle assembly checkpoint is a therapeutic vulnerability of CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant ER+ breast cancer with mitotic aberrations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the accumulation of genomic instability and chromosome segregation errors after the acquisition of resistance to CDK4/6i in ER+ breast cancer and to test the efficacy of mitotic kinase inhibitors as a potential treatment for CDK4/6i-resistant breast cancer patients. <strong>This repository contains whole-exome and shallow whole-genome sequencing from luminal breast cancer cell lines (T47D, LY2, MDA-MB-361, CAMA1, MCF7, KPL1, ZR751, HCC1428) both at the untreated or Parental state and post resistance to Palbociclib.</strong> Palbociclib resistance was developed by continuous dose-escalation of palbociclib up to 0.5-1 μM until cell growth was observed in the presence of the drug (6-8 months for cell lines). During this time, parental cell lines and organoids were cultured in regular media to match the time spent in culture. Once resistance was established, Palbo-R cell lines were cultured in a regular growth medium without palbociclib. Cells were cultured without palbociclib for at least two weeks before evaluating resistance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.069 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".