Neurodevelopmental outcome of preterm very low birth weight infants admitted to an Italian tertiary center over an 11-year period
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This database includes the raw data linked with the paper “Neurodevelopmental outcome of preterm very low birth weight infants admitted to an Italian tertiary center over an 11-year period”. In this paper, we reported the data of perinatal history and neurodevelopmental outcome of a single center cohort of Italian preterm VLBWi born between 2005 and 2015. The aim of the study is to describe neurodevelopmental outcome at 24 months of corrected age and to identify associations between perinatal risk factors and neurodevelopmental outcome. 502 VLBWi completed the follow up. 75.3% showed a normal outcome, 13.9% minor sequelae and 10.8% major sequelae (3.8% cerebral palsy). Male gender (OR 1.59 CI 95% 1.0-2.5 p value 0.043), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (OR 1.7 CI 95% 1.1-2.9 p value 0.026), abnormal neonatal neurological assessment (OR 2.1 CI 95% 1.3-3.4 p value 0.002) and severe brain ultrasound abnormalities (OR 6.1 IC 95% 2.4-15.1 p value <0.001) were independently associated with poor outcome on multivariate ordered logistic regression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".