MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393811745 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7188796

Astur Apple image Dataset

2022· dataset· en· W4393811745 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Agustín Menéndez-Díaz, Silverio García‐Cortés, José Alberto Oliveira Prendes, A. Bello-García

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSmart Agriculture and AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImage (mathematics)Computer scienceCartographyGeographyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Struture of file: 2022-v2-9classes-AsturApple-Balanced-SIZE224-train-dev-test.hdf5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This file contains dataset of 6108 cider apple color images, 224x224 pixels to support the article "Transfer learning with convolutional neural networks for classification of cider apple varieties" results. -The images belong to nine apple classes: 'BLANQUINA' 'CARRIO' 'FLORINA' 'FUENTES' 'PRIETA' 'RAXAO' 'REINETA ENCARNADA' 'REINETA PINTA' 'REINETA ROJA DEL CANADA' -Full dataset is split in 4886 images for training, 611 for testing and 611 for validation. -Class labels are codified as one-hot enconding binary labels. (e.g. [0 0 0 0 0 1 0] ---> Reineta Pinta) -Training image set are store as tensor "trainX": (4168,224,224,3) -Training class labels "trainY": (4886,7) -Test image set tensor "testX": (611, 224,224,3) -Test image binary class labels "testY": (611, 7) -Validation image set tensor "devX": (611, 224,224,3) -Validation binary class labels "devY": (611, 7) * file was created with h5py module in Python.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0670.146

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSmart Agriculture and AIFrench-language works237,207