MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393823895 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3932441

SemEval-2020 Task 5: Modelling Causal Reasoning in Language: Detecting Counterfactuals

2020· dataset· en· W4393823895 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoyu Yang, Stephen Obadinma, Huasha Zhao, Qiong Zhang, Stan Matwin, Xiaodan Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTopic Modeling
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCounterfactual conditionalComputer scienceTask (project management)SemEvalCausal reasoningNatural language processingArtificial intelligenceLinguisticsPsychologyCounterfactual thinkingPhilosophyCognitionEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SemEval-2020 Task 5 Subtask-1: Recognizing Counterfactual Statements (RCS) -- Determine whether a given sentence is counterfactual or not. Subtask-2: Detecting Antecedent and Consequent (DAC) -- Extract the antecedent and consequent part in a given counterfactual sentence. The released dataset consists of train/test data of both subtask-1 and subtask-2. In our competition, participants could only use the corresponding dataset in each subtask. Task 5 Codalab Website: https://competitions.codalab.org/competitions/21691

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicTopic ModelingFrench-language works237,207