MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4393843272 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7754370

Dataset for "Arctic mercury increased through the Last Glacial Termination with a warming climate"

2023· dataset· en· W4393843272 on OpenAlexaff
Delia Segato, Alfonso Saiz‐Lopez, Anoop S. Mahajan, Fei Wang, Juan Pablo Corella, Carlos A. Cuevas, Tobias Erhardt, Camilla Marie Jensen, Chantal Zeppenfeld, Helle Astrid Kjær, Clara Turetta, Warren R. L. Cairns, Carlo Barbante, Andrea Spolaor

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMercury impact and mitigation studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
KeywordsGlacial periodMercury (programming language)ArcticThe arcticEnvironmental scienceClimatologyGlobal warmingClimate changePhysical geographyOceanographyGeologyGeographyGeomorphologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In supplement to: Segato D., Saiz-Lopez A., Mahajan A.S., Wang F., Corella J.P., Cuevas C.A., Erhardt T., Jensen C.M., Zeppenfeld C., Kjær H.A., Turetta C., Cairns W.R.L., Barbante C. and Spolaor A., Arctic mercury increased through the Last Glacial Termination with a warming climate, Nature Geoscience, in press Sheet 1: Mercury (Hg) concentrations measured in the EGRIP ice core for the period 15.7 - 9 kyr before 2000 CE Sheet 2: Bromine (Br), sodium (Na) and calcium (Ca) concentrations measured in the EGRIP ice corefor the period 15.7 - 9 kyr before 2000 CE

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.161

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.043

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicMercury impact and mitigation studies→French-language works237,207→