MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393850412 · doi:10.1016/j.ekir.2024.02.1030

WCN24-2399 PREDICTORS OF WEIGHT GAIN AFTER ONE YEAR OF KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY USING MACHINE LEARNING METHOD

2024· article· en· W4393850412 on OpenAlexaff
Camila Corrêa, Júlia D.R. de Freitas, Elis Forcellini Pedrollo, Pedro Ballester, Cristiane Bauermann Leitão, Gabriela Freitas Pereira de Souza

Bibliographic record

VenueKidney International Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineKidney transplantationExploratory researchTransplantationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metabolic risk factors for the development of cardiovascular disease are extremely common in renal graft recipients. Conditions related to abnormal glucose regulation, dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome (MS), obesity and bone diseases can interfere negatively in the post-operative outcomes and decrease graft survival. In this set, the weight gain after the transplantation appears to be multifactorial and the creation of a prediction model for this outcome should provide adjustment to correlated variables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.461
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKidney International ReportsSame topicArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207