MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393851232 · doi:10.1016/j.ekir.2024.02.526

WCN24-1010 Ramadan Fasting and Kidney Disease Initiative (RaK Initiative)

2024· article· en· W4393851232 on OpenAlexaff
Yousef Boobes, Bachar Afandi, Fatima AlKindi, Ahmad Raed Tarakji, Saeed Al Ghamdi, Mona Alrukhaimi, Mohamed Hassanein, Ali AlSahow, Riyad Said, Khaled Boubes, Jafar Alsaid, Abdulkareem Alsuwaida, Ali Al Obaidli, Nizar Attallah

Bibliographic record

VenueKidney International Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDietary Effects on Health
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityRegional Municipality of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineKidney diseaseGynecologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fasting during the month of Ramadan constitutes an annual Islamic religious practice, necessitating abstinence from food and drink from dawn to sunset. Ramadan Fasting (RF) is an obligatory practice after puberty and some individuals are exempted including sick people, children, elderly, pregnant and menstruating women. Diabetes and Ramadan International Alliance has major impact on enhancing researches in field of diabetes and RF over many years. Limited studies have examined the effect of RF in various kidney diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.564
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKidney International ReportsSame topicDietary Effects on HealthFrench-language works237,207