MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4393855924 · doi:10.17148/ijireeice.2024.12402

Design and Control of Split-Pi DC-DC Converter for Vehicle to Grid and Grid to Vehicle Applications with Development of Energy Management System in MATLAB/Simulink

2024· article· en· W4393855924 on OpenAlexaff
Shetu Roy, Prof. Dr. Wensheng Song

Bibliographic record

VenueIJIREEICE · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGridMATLABDevelopment (topology)Computer scienceControl (management)Control engineeringEngineeringOperating systemMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electric vehicles (EVs) are very useful for reducing carbon emission and energy-efficient transportation.Green energy and minimization of emissions are the needs which are regularly thriving automakers to produce electric transportations.Electric vehicles market is highly increasing day by day and its share will be growing even more higher in the upcoming future.To build up EV battery chargers need AC-DC converters and DC-DC converters.EV chargers can optimize vehicle-to-grid (V2G) and grid-to-vehicle (G2V) operations through properly using bidirectional DC-DC converters.The Split-Pi converter is a recently invented DC-DC converter that can support V2G and G2V operation with its bidirectional functionalities.This paper presents a detailed analysis and control of Split-Pi converter for V2G and G2V operation, and development of energy management system.The energy management combination of Lithium-Ion batteries and supercapacitors in EVs can minimize cost, maximizing its range, efficiency and reliability.The EV charging system employing Split-Pi converter analyzed for V2G and G2V applications has been designed in the MATLAB/Simulink platform.Although many topologies and ideas are modified regarding those applications, there are still some processes to identify the new methodologies.Split-Pi converter-based battery and energy management system must be taken into consideration to prevent battery problems such as battery aging, power losses, and slow charging.Both battery lifetime and efficiency can be improved by this way.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIJIREEICE→Same topicAdvanced DC-DC Converters→French-language works237,207→