Ready-To-Use Investigational Stem Cells, MiSaver, in Patients with Recent Acute Myocardial Infarction, 1 year follow up from a Phase 1 Safety Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the safety of MiSaver stem cells and their preliminary efficacy in improving left ventricular ejection function and functional activity in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) Background Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death globally. In 2019, an estimated 17.9 million people died from CVDs, accounting for 32% of all global deaths. Among these deaths, 85% were due to heart attacks and strokes. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery after myocardial infarction (MI) is an important prognostic indicator, and patients who do not recover LVEF after MI are at high risk of sudden cardiac arrest events and death. Stem cell therapy holds promise for cardiovascular diseases, offering regenerative potential through cell differentiation. However, limited access exists for clinicians and patients. This study investigates the safety and efficacy of MiSaver (Myocardial Infarction Functional Saver), a prefabricated stem cell investigational product, in recent AMI patients. Findings contribute to advancing stem cell treatments, improving accessibility and patient outcomes. Methods Patients who were admitted for AMI within 7 days and had reduced LVEF (.45%) were eligible for the study. MiSaver were matched for blood group and administered in participants in cohorts of five, each receiving escalating dosages (0.5×10^7, 1.6×10^7, and 5.0×10^7 cells/kg, respectively). Patients were assessed for symptoms of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and treatment-related adverse events (AE). LVEF measured by echocardiographic on admission, at 6 months, and at 12 months after treatment. Patients functional activity status evalution ( using the New York Heart Association (NYHA) and Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) classification systems. Results Out of the initially planned 15 participants, eleven were enrolled in the study. The trial was halted prematurely due to challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and impractical transportation logistics. Patients received MiSaver infusions within 2-5 days post-AMI onset. During the 12-month follow-up period, no study-related adverse events or signs of graft-versus-host disease were reported. At 12 months post-treatment, both the low and middle dose groups, as well as participant 11, showed improved LVEF, accompanied by enhanced Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class grades compared to baseline. Conclusion The intravenous infusion of MiSaver stem cells in AMI patients demonstrated safety and tolerability for low and middle dosage groups. The study provides promising insights into the potential of stem cells therapy in improving left ventricular function following AMI. However, further research with larger cohorts and a controlled placebo is warranted to confirm these findings and address limitations encountered during this trial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".