388 Prototyping a mobile phone application for Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy patient monitoring and data collection post-discharge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Research objectives include prototyping a mobile phone application that allows physicians to monitor CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy patients remotely after discharge. This app will also enable standardized data collection across different centers that provide CAR-T cell therapy and allow for the harmonization of follow-up protocols. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Literature review and semi-structured interviews with patients, clinical coordinators, and other experts in the field will be used to determine what parameters must be included in the mobile application prototype to effectively monitor the side effects of CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy. The mobile phone application will be designed using process mapping to integrate data from self-reporting and wearable technologies, including the Garmin smart watch. Figma will then be used to develop new screens based on an existing patient monitoring app for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant follow-up. Finally, a preliminary feasibility study will be conducted to collect feedback on the app prototype from CAR T-cell therapy patients, providers, and stakeholders. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The anticipated results of this study include an app prototype that will include the functionalities required to monitor patients for adverse effects of CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy. This will include the parameters that will be recorded or measured using a combination of self-reporting, a reliable body temperature sensor, and the Garmin watch which monitors basic vitals, activity, and sleep. Additional parameters may be added during the stakeholder co-design process. The app prototype will include a physician interface where doctors can monitor their patients and will be alerted if they require further physician assessment. It is expected that the app will provide standardized monitoring of patients when they are discharged from the hospital after receiving CAR T-cell therapy. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This app will allow physicians to monitor patients for general follow-up and adverse effects, including cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity. Future studies may utilize this app to develop best practices for harmonizing CAR-T follow-up protocols across Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".