Bibliographic record
Abstract
Porcherie (fin du 19e siècle), fibre - bois et métal, 475 x 412,50 cm, Musée POP, Collection Robert-Lionel-Séguin Porcherie à toit de chaume Cette porcherie construite à la fin du XIXe siècle appartenait à Frédéric Berthiaume de Pointe-du-Lac. La technique utilisée pour la fabrication de la toiture de chaume est typique de cette région. Ce genre de recouvrement était aussi utilisé aux XVIIIe et XIXe siècles dans d'autres régions du Québec pour toutes sortes de bâtiments : hangar, porcherie et granges. Le type de chaume employé diffère selon les régions. Dans Charlevoix, on utilise la paille de seigle tandis que dans la région du lac St-Pierre, on se sert de foin de grève. Habituellement, le 1er rang de chaume est placé en bottes de 10 à 15 cm de diamètre. Le 2e rang, et les suivants, sont étendus sans que le chaume soit lié et maintenus par une perche. La superposition des rangs assure l'étanchéité du bâtiment. Deux planches disposées sur le faîte complètent le recouvrement. Source: Objaverse 1.0 / Sketchfab
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.184 | 0.052 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".