MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393879103 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4770723

Sulfur K-edge X-ray absorption near-edge spectral analysis of thiourea free ligand and its Zn(II), Co(II), and Ni(II) complexes

2021· dataset· en· W4393879103 on OpenAlexaffabout
Matt Queen, Farideh Jalilehvand, Róbert K. Szilágyi

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNonlinear Optical Materials Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThioureaSulfurChemistryX-rayAbsorption (acoustics)Ligand (biochemistry)Absorption edgeCrystallographyInorganic chemistryEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Nuclear chemistryMaterials sciencePhysicsOpticsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electronic supporting information for the analysis and interpretation of sulfur K-edge X-ray absorption near-edge spectra of thiourea free ligand and its [Zn(TU)4]2+, [Co(TU)4]2+, and [Ni(TU)6]2+ complexes. Sulfur K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) was employed to experimentally define the nature of coordinative bond between thiourea (TU) or thiocarbamide ligand and Zn2+, Co2+, and Ni2+ ions in distorted tetrahedral and octahedral homoleptic coordination environments. Comparisons of XAS spectra of the free TU ligand, [Zn(TU)4]2+, [Co(TU)4]2+, and [Ni(TU)6]2+ complexes clearly identify spectral features emerging from the structural non-innocent TM2+–S(TU) bonding. Quantitative analysis of pre-edge intensities describes the covalency of Ni2+– and Co2+–S(TU) bonding to be at most 23% and 9% as expressed by the S 3p contributions per 3d electron hole. Using relevant Ni2+ complexes with dithiocarbamate and thioether ligands, we evaluated the empirical S 1s→3p transition dipole integrals developed for sulfur ligands and its dependence on heteroatom substitutions. With the aid of density functional theory-based ground electronic state calculations, we found evidence for the need of using a transition dipole that is dependent on the presence of conjugated heteroatom (N) substitution in the S-ligands. Table of Contents: Worksheets "transition dipole" and "spectral modeling summary" contain data for empirical S 1s->3p transition dipole integral estimates and summary of spectral modeling, respectively. RAW_DATA folder: ASCII formatted S K-edge XAS data from BL 4-3 of SSRL, and data obtained for the [Ni(TU)6]2+ complex at the double-crystal monochromator beamline (formerly Canadian Beamline) of Synchrotron Research Center (the home of Aladdin), in Stoughton, Wisconsin. SPECTRAL_MODELS folder Electronic spreadsheets, PeakFit spectral fitting templates, spectra as user-defined functions, quantitative analysis of pre-edge feature intensities XRD_STRUCTURES folder Xmol (XYZ) and DSViewerPro (MSV) files for the analysis of the crystal packing environment of TU complexes. DFT_CALCULATIONS Gaussian09 log files for free thiourea, Co(II) and Ni(II) complexes at BP86/def2TZVP, B3LYP/def2TZVP, and TPSS/def2TZVP levels of theory; frequency calculations for IR vibrational spectral simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicNonlinear Optical Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207