MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393880712 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6908727

ab initio REPEAT Charge MOF Database (ARC-MOF)

2024· dataset· en· W4393880712 on OpenAlexaff
Jake Burner, Jun Luo, Andrew J. P. White, Adam Mirmiran, Ohmin Kwon, Peter G. Boyd, Steven M. Maley, Marco Gibaldi, Scott Simrod, Tom K. Woo

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAb initioCharge (physics)Arc (geometry)Materials scienceChemistryPhysicsEngineeringOrganic chemistryMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a database of ~280,000 MOFs which have been either experimentally characterized or computationally generated, spanning all publicly available MOF databases. DFT-derived REPEAT charges, adsorption data, and various descriptors are available for all MOFs. all_structures_1.tar.gz and all_structures_2.tar.gz – these are the cif files that were considered to compose the “entire known design space” of MOFs, with any bad structures removed (split into two separate tarballs since it is a lot of data). ARCMOF_20220610.tar.gz – these are all of the cif files with REPEAT charges composing ARC-MOF. flig-clusters.csv, func-clusters.csv, geo-clusters.csv, mc-clusters.csv – Each file indicates for each MOF which cluster it belongs to, and whether the MOF is present in ARC-MOF. This is done for each "type" of MOF chemistry and for the geometric properties. Clusters with a negative value indicate the MOF does not belong to any cluster (i.e., it is assumed to be "unique"). all_topology_lists.csv – a csv file containing the topology reported by the filename of applicable structures, and the topology reported by CrystalNets.jl ML_test_set.tar.gz – these are the cif files (with REPEAT charges) of the MOFs in the diverse-mc subset, but missing from ARC-MOF (for the purposes of a ML test set for the prediction of metal charges). geometric_properties.csv – a csv file containing geometric descriptors computed for this study for all MOFs. The csv file also indicates which MOFs are present in ARC-MOF, and the order in which they were chosen for the farthest point sampling (up to 100K MOFs). RACs.csv – See geometric_properties.csv description. Same type of file, but with the RAC descriptors. RDFs.csv – The RDFs for each MOF, using several atomic properties. Some atomic properties are not available for all elements. In the cases where the atomic property is not available for a particular structure, no value is assigned. methane.csv, methane_purification-CH4.csv, methane_purification_CO2.csv, post_comb_vsa-CO2.csv, post_comb_vsa-N2.csv, pre_comb_4040-CO2.csv, pre_comb_4040-H2.csv, landfill-CH4.csv, landfill-CO2.csv – these are csv files of the raw uptake data and various temperature, pressure conditions (with standard deviations) for each gas separation process specified in the file overall_process.csv. overall_process.csv – This is a csv file of the adsorption properties of the MOFs. Particularly, the csv files contain the working capacity (mmol/g_working_capacity) and selectivity of each MOF for each of the five process conditions. mc-diverse-set.csv, func-diverse-set.csv – csv files containing which MOFs are present in each diverse set (from farthest point sampling of the MOFs based on either their functional group chemistry or metal chemistry). The file indicates which MOFs are present in ARC-MOF and which are not. ARC-MOF_Dim.csv – Dimensionality of MOFs in ARC-MOF determined using the CSD Python API, as implemented in https://github.com/uowoolab/MOF-Dimension-Analyzer. Version history of repository: v2 -- added file: "all_topology_lists.csv" v3 -- added file: "ML_test_set.tar.gz" v4 -- replaced file: "ML_test_set.tar.gz". Originally incorrect repository of cifs v5 -- A slightly updated version of ARC-MOF has been provided. Some MOFs were removed from ARC-MOF due to structural errors. Some MOFs in ARC-MOF containing Sm were updated, as they had incorrectly assigned charges. Additional MOFs from all_structures containing Sm were added to ARC-MOF. v6 -- Updated version of ARC-MOF. Removed of all m29 structures from the Boyd-Woo database, since the inorganic SBU is not known to exist. v7 -- Added dimensionality information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.121

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicAdvanced X-ray and CT ImagingFrench-language works237,207