MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393899471 · doi:10.26685/urncst.554

The Relationship of Food Insecurity and Mental Health in Single-Parent Households: A Literature Review

2024· review· en· W4393899471 on OpenAlexaff
Jorja R. Strickland

Bibliographic record

VenueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFood insecurityMental healthPsychologyEnvironmental healthDevelopmental psychologyFood securityGeographyPsychiatryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Food insecurity is a prominent concern worldwide. While food insecurity is recognized as an extensive physical health concern globally, it also has impacts on our mental well-being, contributing to elevated rates of depression and stress, among other symptoms of psychological distress. This relationship between food insecurity and poor mental health is heavily supported; however, previous research on this topic has focused on nuclear families as opposed to single-parent family structures. This review aims to comprehensively examine food insecurity and mental health in single-parent households to better understand the role that family structure may play in this relationship. Methods: A literature search was conducted using three terms stipulated for study inclusion: “mental health”, “food insecurity”, and “single parent”. Primary studies were identified with no restrictions on study type and type of data (qualitative or quantitative) for a more comprehensive review. Results: All of the studies included in this review support a relation between food insecurity and mental health in single-parent households, with individuals in this demographic experiencing higher rates of both compared to the general population. This relation was observed in people from a variety of developed countries, suggesting some degree of generalizability. Discussion: It can be conclusively established that being in a single-parent household increases the risk of food insecurity, contributing to poor mental health within this population. There are many gaps in the literature on single-parent households to explore further, including the experience of single fathers and how this relation appears in developing countries as well as a need to explore a wider range of mental health conditions resulting from food insecurity. Conclusion: Food insecurity is a significant concern in single-parent households. This increases the risk of poor mental health in these households, seen in higher rates of depression, among other conditions. Public health institutions should consequently consider this demographic when working towards new programs or initiatives aimed at addressing food insecurity and mental health problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.834
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.450
GPT teacher head0.593
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) JournalSame topicFood Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsFrench-language works237,207