MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393900561 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4186508/v1

Optimizing the Video Streaming Performance with an Energy-Efficient Evolution of Cub to Predator Based Resource Allocation

2024· preprint· en· W4393900561 on OpenAlexaff
S. P. Subotha, L. Femila, S. M. Swamy, I.R. Valarmathi

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPredatorComputer scienceResource allocationResource (disambiguation)Real-time computingComputer networkEcologyPredationBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<title>Abstract</title> Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) and video streaming services have gained popularity in recent years. The MPEG-4 H.264/AVC protocol has been widely adopted for video streaming in WSNs, but it is important to transmit sensitive video packets securely to protect the confidentiality of mission-critical applications. It is crucial to ensure that security measures do not negatively impact network performance or video quality. While previous research has focused on secure and energy-efficient video streaming over WSNs, none have addressed the integration of video quality optimization and energy consumption.This study aims to create a more efficient method of encrypting video streaming in wireless sensor networks (WSNs) by combining selective Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) with Evolution of Cub to Predator (ECP). The proposed method improves energy, distortion, and encryption performance by up to 10 dB more than other methods (EEP, UEP (GA), and MCS-RA) through the use of network resource allocation with ECP-RA in WSNs. Quantitative measures such as MSE, PSNR, RMSE, and SSIM demonstrate that this approach is superior to others.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score0.710

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207