A review on applications of fine particles integrated with fluidization technologies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Fine particles possess remarkable characteristics including extensive surface‐to‐weight ratios and diverse morphologies. Consequently, through the use of fluidization techniques, they have become favoured in various industrial processes, especially with continuous production. This review paper offers a comprehensive exploration of the integration of fine particle applications with fluidization technologies, with a specific focus on the Geldart Group C particles sized <25–40 μm. Although there are challenges with processing fine particles such as the strong cohesion in fluidized beds, recent progress, including the nanoparticle modulation method, has demonstrated potential solutions. These advancements render these cohesive particles applicable to industrial applications in different fields, including gas‐phase catalytic reactions, gas–solid fluidized bed coal beneficiation, ultrafine powder coating (UPC), pharmaceuticals, environmental sustainability, energy storage, and food processing. However, further research is needed to obtain a better understanding of fine particle fluidization in industrial settings in order to achieve larger‐scale implementation. In summary, this review provides a comprehensive overview of fine particle utilization integrated with fluidization technologies, demonstrating the potential in large‐scale industrial processes, and enabling significant advancements in practical applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".