MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393902065 · doi:10.1055/a-2298-4670

Gestational Age-Specific Markers Associated with Postnatal Intervention in Fetal Suspicion of Coarctation of the Aorta

2024· article· en· W4393902065 on OpenAlexaff
Sam Amar, Shiran Sara Moore, Punnanee Wutthigate, Amanda Ohayon, Daniela Villegas Martinez, Jessica Simoneau, Claudia Renaud, Gabriel Altit

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Perinatology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health CentreMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFetusGestational ageGestationObstetricsPregnancyCoarctation of the aortaSmall for gestational ageAortaFetal echocardiographyPrenatal diagnosisInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Fetal diagnosis of coarctation of the aorta (CoA) is currently associated with a high false-positive rate. Many predictive markers may be gestational age (GA)-specific. We sought to establish GA-specific traditional and speckle-tracking fetal echocardiography (STE) markers predictive of true CoA in neonates with prenatal suspicion. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective case-control study. We compared the fetal ventricular and arch dimensions, as well as the deformation parameters by STE, of infants who required a postnatal intervention for their CoA with those who did not. Cohort was stratified based on GA before or after 30 weeks. Data extractors were masked to the outcome. The first fetal echocardiogram available was used. RESULTS: Seventy-five newborns with a fetal echocardiography performed between October 2013 and May 2022 for an antenatal suspicion of CoA were included, of which 59 (79%) had an aortic arch with nonsignificant obstruction upon ductal closure, and 16 (21%) underwent a neonatal intervention for a confirmed CoA. Before 30 weeks' GA, the right ventricular to left ventricular (RV/LV) end-diastolic width and end-diastolic area (EDA) ratios were most associated with postnatal CoA confirmation (area under the curve [AUCs] = 0.96 and 0.92). After 30 weeks' GA, the RV/LV end-diastolic width ratio (AUC = 0.95), the Z-score for the ascending aorta (AUC = 0.93), and the LV end-diastolic width Z-score (AUC = 0.91) performed the best. A decreased RV peak longitudinal strain was observed in those who developed true CoA and performed well by receiver operating characteristic analysis after 30 weeks (AUC = 0.85). In the overall cohort, the RV/LV EDA ratio was the most sensitive predictor of CoA and identified all cases with CoA. Indeed, a cutoff > 1.24 had a specificity of 69.5% and a sensitivity of 100% (receiver operating characteristic curve with an AUC of 0.88). CONCLUSION: We outlined sensitive and specific fetal markers associated with postnatal CoA based on GA at suspicion. KEY POINTS: · Fetal ventricular disproportion predicts postnatal coarctation.. · A decreased right ventircular contraction was observed in those with coarctation.. · Fetal markers differ based on gestational age at fetal evaluation..

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of PerinatologySame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207