MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393904201 · doi:10.32718/nvlvet-a10001

Growth and efficiency of piglets of Danish and Canadian origin in the south of Ukraine

2024· article· en· W4393904201 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
V. V. Voloshynov

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Biological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDanishGeographyAnimal scienceBiologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, against the background of a declining share of domestic pig breeds in Ukraine, there has been a trend towards an increase in the share of foreign-bred meat pig breeds, with Landrace and Large White breeds being of particular interest, using different breeding methods. This indicates a growing interest from producers. Duroc boars are consistently leading the way in selling industrial hybrids and crossbreds. The experiment was conducted in 2023 at Agro Novorayske, a limited liability company in the Kherson region. The material for the research was piglets obtained from crossbred sows (Landrace × Large), which were inseminated with sperm from Danish and Canadian Duroc boars. For the experiment, 250 piglets of Danish and Canadian origin were selected using the analogue group method. As part of the scientific and economic experiment, the following were studied: growth intensity, safety, and feed conversion during the rearing of piglets of Danish and Canadian breeds. The efficiency of their rearing was also determined. It was found that piglets of Canadian origin had a 0.8 % higher preservation rate, 8.0 % higher growth rate, and 8.0% higher absolute growth, which resulted in a 7.9 % higher weight of pigs at the end of growing compared to their Danish counterparts. It was proved that piglets of Canadian origin, with equal daily feed intake, consumed almost the same amount of feed during the growing period at nearly identical costs. Still, due to higher growth energy, they showed an 8.0 % lower feed cost per kilogram of weight gain during this period. It was found that piglets of Canadian origin growing at almost equal cost of increasing one head had a 2.50 % lower cost per kg of gilts at the end of increasing but had a 5.2 % higher cost per gilt at the end of growing, 7.9 % higher cost of one gilts at this time, 16.3 % higher income from the sale of one grown gilts and 3.41 % higher profitability of growing one piglet compared to their peers of Danish origin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.585
Threshold uncertainty score0.825

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and BiotechnologiesSame topicAgriculture and Biological StudiesFrench-language works237,207