MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393920371 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10114719

GNSS-IR data for "Real-time water levels using GNSS-IR: a potential tool for flood monitoring"

2023· dataset· en· W4393920371 on OpenAlexaffabout
David Purnell, Natalya Gomez, W. G. Minarik, Gregory Langston

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGNSS applicationsFlood mythEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingComputer scienceReal-time computingGlobal Positioning SystemGeographyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Organised SNR data used for GNSS-IR analysis in the article "Real-time water levels using GNSS-IR: a potential tool for flood monitoring" by David Purnell, Natalya Gomez, William Minarik and Gregory Langston. The directories 'rv3s' and 'sjdlr' contain SNR data corresponding to sites Trois-Rivières and Saint-Joseph-de-la-Rive, respectively. Software for processing the data can be found at: https://github.com/purnelldj/gnssir_rt SNR data is given as text files in the format specified here except for columns 4+: https://gnssrefl.readthedocs.io/en/latest/pages/file_structure.html#the-snr-data-format columns: 1. sat PRN with an offset such that GLONASS satellites are between 100-200 and Galileo are between 200-300 2. satellite elevation (degrees) 3. azi is satellite azimuth (degrees) 4. GPS time (seconds since 1980) 5. L1 SNR

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.081

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicWater Quality Monitoring TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207