MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4393921237 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4317553

Global daily Aerosol Optical Depth measurements from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on NASA's Aqua and Terra satellites

2020· dataset· en· W4393921237 on OpenAlexaff
Nicolas Gendron-Carrier, Marco Gonzalez-Navarro, Stefano Polloni, Matthew A. Turner

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModerate-resolution imaging spectroradiometerRemote sensingSpectroradiometerAerosolEnvironmental scienceSatelliteMeteorologyGeologyReflectivityGeographyPhysicsOpticsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This repository contains input MODIS AOD data prepared for “Subways and Urban Air Polution” by Gendron-Carrier, Gonzalez-Navarro, Polloni and Turner (American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20180168). The main replication archive is available at https://doi.org/10.3886/E126401V1 . Description of input MODIS AOD data The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometers aboard the Terra and Aqua earth-observing satellites provide daily measures of the aerosol optical depth of the atmosphere at a 3km spatial resolution everywhere in the world. Data is available in ‘granules’ which describe five minutes of satellite time. These granules are available, more or less continuously, from February 24, 2000 for the Terra satellite and from July 4, 2002 for Aqua. During September of 2018, we downloaded all available granules for Terra and Aqua until August 31, 2018 and subsequently consolidated them into daily rasters describing global AOD. In August 2020, we processed additional Terra data. This archive therefore contains daily rasters for Aqua (from 2002-07-04 to 2018-08-31) and Terra (from 2000-02-24 to 2020-07-31). We note that February 2005 data are missing for the Aqua satellite. We use source products MOD04_3K (https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD04_L2.006) and MYD04_3K (https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD04_L2.006). The product files are stored in Hierarchical Data Format (HDF) and we use the "Optical Depth Land And Ocean" layer, which is stored as a Scientific Data Set (SDS) within the HDF file, as our measure of aerosol optical depth. The "Optical Depth Land And Ocean" dataset contains only the AOD retrievals of high quality. We convert all HDF formatted granules to GIS compatible formats using the HDF-EOS To GeoTIFF Conversion Tool (HEG) provided by NASA’s Earth Observing System Program. We consolidate GeoTIFF granules into a global raster for each day using ArcGIS. First, we keep only AOD values that do contain information. The missing value is -9999 in AOD retrievals. Second, we create a raster catalog with all the granules for a given day and calculate the average AOD value using the Raster Catalog to Raster Dataset tool. The code used to accomplish this is included for reference purposes in “dofiles/old_work” of the main replication archive at https://doi.org/10.3886/E126401V1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.043

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAir Quality Monitoring and Forecasting→French-language works237,207→